Je soumets à votre attention un billet publié sur le site Web
Inside Counsel et intitulé Records
management might be a career dead-end, but information governance is not. L’auteur
s’emploie à démontrer que le concept de « Records Management » est en
voie d’être supplanté par celui de la « gouvernance de l’information ».
Je me suis bidonné en considérant certains arguments invoqués :
« While traditional
records management may be somewhat limiting, a larger information governance
program that address not only policies but also execution, defensible
disposition, information access, discovery and privacy compliance may
paradoxically offer career-enhancing opportunities for legal professionals. »
Ou encore :
« One of the hottest
areas in corporate legal circles these days is Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
(FCPA) compliance. […] For FCPA compliance, this requires managing not only
what we call “big R” records, which must be retained for a period of time to
satisfy regulatory or legal requirements (expense reports, for example) but
also “little r” records which there is no specific regulatory mandate to keep,
like e-mails to subcontracting partners to ensure FCPA compliance and
defensibility. Good information governance is a key component of FCPA
compliance and defensibility, and far-thinking organizations are expanding
their records program. »
Si on ne parle pas des objectifs d’un système de gestion des
documents d’activité (Records Management) dans un environnement technologique,
je me demande bien de quoi l'on parle.
Le commentaire qui accompagne ce texte m’a toutefois conforté :
« A rose by any other
name... no matter how many times people try to re-brand it, it's STILL Records
Management. Someone has to manage the content, records, information, knowledge,
objects, documents... »
Michel Roberge
Aucun commentaire:
Publier un commentaire